Can small manufacturers get PPWR exemptions in 2026?
In 2026, small manufacturers cannot get a general exemption from PPWR. The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation applies to every economic operator placing packaging on the EU market, regardless of company size. Two narrow carve-outs exist for micro-enterprises specifically, but they are limited in scope and do not reduce the core compliance burden. Here is what small packaging businesses actually need to know.
Who qualifies as a small manufacturer under PPWR?
Under PPWR, there is no special category called “small manufacturer.” The regulation applies to all economic operators – manufacturers, importers, distributors, and online marketplaces – based on their role in the supply chain, not their size. The only size-based distinction the regulation draws is between ordinary businesses and micro-enterprises, defined as companies with fewer than 10 employees whose annual turnover and balance sheet total both remain below €2 million.
Both conditions must be met simultaneously. Critically, the size test applies to the entire global group, not just EU operations. A small European subsidiary of a larger international company does not qualify as a micro-enterprise under PPWR, even if its local headcount is minimal.
Role classification matters just as much as size. Under Article 21 of the regulation, if your name or trademark appears on the packaging, you are the manufacturer for PPWR purposes – regardless of where or by whom the packaging was physically produced. A company can also hold different roles for different products simultaneously, acting as a manufacturer for one SKU and an importer for another. Role determination must therefore happen at the individual packaging type level, not at the company level.
It is worth noting that the European Parliament debated a broader exemption covering businesses with up to 49 employees and €10 million in turnover. That proposal was not adopted. The final regulation uses the standard micro-enterprise definition, leaving the vast majority of small and medium-sized businesses fully within scope.
What exemptions does PPWR actually offer to small businesses?
PPWR offers no general exemption for small businesses. The only targeted carve-outs are reserved for micro-enterprises meeting the strict definition above, and they address two specific obligations rather than reducing overall compliance requirements.
The Article 15 documentation shift
Where a micro-enterprise has packaging designed or manufactured under its own name or trademark, and its packaging supplier is based within the EU, the supplier assumes the manufacturer’s obligations under Article 15. This means the supplier – not the micro-enterprise brand owner – prepares the Declaration of Conformity and supporting technical documentation. EPR registration and reporting obligations remain the brand’s own responsibility; this carve-out does not touch them.
The Article 29 reuse target exemption
A micro-enterprise that places no more than 1,000 kg of packaging on the market in a given Member State in a calendar year is exempt from the binding reuse targets that apply from 2030 onward. The precise conditions are still to be confirmed through delegated acts, so businesses relying on this carve-out should monitor Commission updates closely before treating it as settled.
Beyond these two carve-outs, core obligations apply universally from 12 August 2026: substance restrictions including strict PFAS concentration limits for food-contact packaging, a Declaration of Conformity per packaging type, technical documentation, a unique identifier on each unit, and EPR registration in every Member State where packaging reaches the market. Packaging minimisation requirements under Article 10 become binding for all operators, including micro-enterprises, from 2030, with no size-based relief.
How do you apply for a PPWR exemption before 2026?
There is no formal application process for PPWR exemptions. The carve-outs available to micro-enterprises are self-assessed and self-declared. No EU authority registers or approves exemption claims in advance. The burden of proof sits entirely within the company’s own technical documentation.
To access the Article 15 documentation carve-out, a business must confirm it meets the micro-enterprise definition, confirm its EU-based packaging supplier is located within the Union, and ensure the supplier is aware it assumes full manufacturer obligations. Suppliers can choose not to accept this burden, particularly for smaller custom orders, so early supplier conversations are essential.
For all operators, including small businesses that do not qualify for any carve-out, the practical compliance steps are as follows:
- Determine your role per packaging type (manufacturer, importer, distributor, or producer under EPR rules)
- Prepare a Declaration of Conformity for each packaging type, following the model structure in Annex VIII of the regulation
- Compile technical documentation per Annex VII, covering material composition, substance declarations, and recyclability assessments
- Commission PFAS testing from an accredited laboratory – for food-contact packaging this is a priority task, as laboratory lead times can run to several months
- Register as a producer in each EU Member State where packaging is placed on the market (there is currently no single EU-wide registry)
- Appoint an Authorised Representative in each Member State where you are not established, if you are a non-EU producer
Technical documentation must be retained for five years for single-use packaging and ten years for reusable packaging from the date of placing on the market. Failure to produce documentation within ten days of an authority’s request is itself treated as a compliance failure, regardless of whether the physical packaging meets substantive requirements. The Commission’s official guidance, including a second-edition FAQ published in August 2026, is the primary interpretive resource for navigating these steps.
What happens if a small manufacturer doesn’t meet PPWR requirements by 2026?
Non-compliance with PPWR from 12 August 2026 carries real commercial and legal consequences. There is no grace period for packaging placed on the market after that date. Packaging already on the market before 12 August 2026 may remain in circulation, but anything entering the market from that date onward must already comply.
PPWR itself does not set EU-wide fine amounts. Instead, Article 68 requires each Member State to establish national sanctions that are effective, proportionate, and dissuasive, with penalty rules to be notified to the Commission by February 2027. Secondary sources cite indicative ranges running into hundreds of thousands of euros per violation in some jurisdictions, alongside powers to issue immediate sales bans, product withdrawal orders, and import restrictions.
Beyond financial penalties, the commercial consequences can be more immediately damaging. Retailers and online marketplaces are required to verify EPR registration before allowing listings. An infringement recorded in one Member State is shared across EU market surveillance systems, meaning a compliance failure in one country can trigger parallel action wherever the same packaging is distributed.
The European Commission’s August 2026 guidance did indicate that market surveillance authorities should initially adopt a supportive enforcement posture, giving businesses a warning and a genuine opportunity for corrective action before escalating to fines or product recalls. This is not a postponement or a grace period – it is an enforcement-posture statement that applies to companies of every size. Businesses are still expected to demonstrate they have taken reasonable steps toward compliance and to respond promptly to any authority requests.
For food packaging manufacturers in particular, the PFAS restriction carries no transitional stock-exhaustion period. Packaging containing PFAS above the permitted concentration limits cannot be placed on the EU market from 12 August 2026, full stop. Companies whose products use fiber-based structures with thin plastic film barriers rather than fluorinated chemical coatings are better positioned relative to this specific restriction, but all food-contact packaging producers still need verified test reports in their technical files to demonstrate compliance.